Author
Abstract
Amid escalating geopolitical tensions, France plays a pivotal role in shaping European security through its commitment to strategic autonomy while maintaining its NATO obligations. As one of Europe’s most influential military powers, France has positioned itself as a regional leader, balancing its transatlantic commitments with its vision for a more sovereign European defence. France, a NATO founding member, has historically oscillated between transatlantic cooperation and the pursuit of an independent defence strategy. A defining moment in this regard was France's withdrawal from NATO's integrated command in 1966, under General de Gaulle, reflecting its ambition to maintain full sovereignty over its military decisions. This strategic posture, known as the Gaullo-Mitterrandism doctrine, continues to shape France’s dual approach today. After decades of pragmatic cooperation, France officially rejoined NATO’s integrated military structure in 2009 under President Nicolas Sarkozy, aiming to strengthen its influence within the alliance while continuing to advocate for a more self-reliant European defence. The concept of European strategic autonomy, widely promoted by France, envisions a security framework that enables the European Union to act independently in matters of defence, economy, and technology. Initiatives such as PESCO, European Defence Fund and the Strategic Compass have been implemented to enhance Europe's military capabilities. Nevertheless, significant challenges persist: NATO remains the central pillar of security for many European Union member states, and the United States has expressed concerns about potential divergences in transatlantic defence cooperation. Drawing on the 2022 National Strategic Review and key historical analyses, this paper examines France's dual approach—its deep-rooted commitment to NATO alongside its ambition for greater European defence autonomy. The findings highlight the inherent paradox in its strategy: while advocating for European sovereignty, France remains a key pillar of NATO’s security architecture. Furthermore, the study evaluates whether France can effectively achieve its vision of a more independent European defence structure or if geopolitical realities – such as diverging strategic cultures within the European Union and controversies surrounding recent French declarations-will necessitate continued reliance on NATO. Finally, the paper assesses the long-term implications of this strategy for European security and transatlantic relations by 2030.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:mvn:incsec:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:91-118
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
- F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
- H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mvn:incsec:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:91-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Condruț Cristian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.animv.ro .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.