IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Took So Long? An Analysis of Survival Times for Movie Sequels


  • Alexander Hakemoller Marsh
  • Colin Cannonier

    (Belmont University)


Movie sequel windowing is one area that has been neglected in the existing economic literature. While there are many potential areas for economic research in the film industry, the lack of research specifically on sequels and their timing is rather surprising amidst the increasing saturation of sequels in the market place. Using a dataset constructed from an IMDb list and data from The Numbers, this research models the timing between sequels using an accelerated failure time survival model in order to understand when film studios decide to release a sequel. The results show that while film studios do release sequels quicker the more money the previous movie makes, the decrease in time is inelastic and not economically significant. The most significant factor that influenced timing between sequels was whether the movie was produced by the same studio as the previous movie. Time between sequels is increased 69% (752 days) whenever a different studio is producing the sequel. Similarly, time between sequels decreases by 45% (487 days) if the previous movie in the series was profitable, by 44% (482 days) if produced by a major film studio, and by 29% (319 days) if the movie or series is based on a preexisting work. The results are robust to a variety of sensitivity checks related to holiday releases, ratings, genres and period-specific effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Hakemoller Marsh & Colin Cannonier, 2018. "What Took So Long? An Analysis of Survival Times for Movie Sequels," Journal of Economic Insight (formerly the Journal of Economics (MVEA)), Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 44(1), pages 1-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:44:y:2018:i:1:p:1-20

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:44:y:2018:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ken Brown). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.