IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Wage Differentials and the Mating Taboo 1970-1980

  • Linda Y. Wong


Registered author(s):

    This paper studies the role of the mating taboo (distaste for intermarriage) in explaining the narrowing mean wage gaps between intermarried and intramarried black men. A search framework is extended to incorporate agents' races. To offset the mating taboo, agents who intermarry raise selection criterion; such selection behavior implies that the conditional expected intermarriage output can exceed the conditional mean intramarriage output. Samples of newlyweds from the 1970-1980 Census are used to examine the wage gap response to the mating taboo. After controlling for self-selection, the predicted positive mean wage gap for college educated black men diminishes from 1970 to 1980, while it rises for high-school dropouts. The mating taboo accounts for most of the mean wage gap for all education levels between 1970 and 1980. In particular, the magnitude of the mating taboo declines from 1970-1980 for college graduates but increases for high-school dropouts.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Missouri Valley Economic Association in its journal The Journal of Economics.

    Volume (Year): 27 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 21-40

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:27:y:2001:i:1:p:21-40
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:27:y:2001:i:1:p:21-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ken Brown)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.