IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jyf1hn/doi10.1431-88004y2017i3p435-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice contexts and social communication

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo De Angelis

Abstract

This research investigates how one element of the choice context, namely assortment size, influences the tendency to share, both offline and through social networks, positive versus negative purchase or consumption experiences. The idea advanced in this paper is that consumers tend to share positive experiences if such experiences are the outcome of choices made in large assortments, while they tend to share negative experiences if such experiences are the outcome of choices made in small assortments. In other words, product categories presenting a high number of options increase consumers' tendency to talk about positive experiences but decrease consumers' tendency to talk about negative experiences. Such an effect is attributable to the fact that wide assortments, in addition to enhance feelings of information overload, make consumers perceive a relatively higher degree of control over the outcome of their choice, deriving from the fact that consumers have a greater freedom of choice compared to contexts characterized by a few options. This, in turn, leads them to see the positive or negative outcome as the result of their ability to choose. Three experimental studies conducted in different settings provide empirical evidence supporting both the effect and the underlying theoretical mechanisms proposed to drive it.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo De Angelis, 2017. "Choice contexts and social communication," Micro & Macro Marketing, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 435-456.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/88004:y:2017:i:3:p:435-456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1431/88004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1431/88004
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/88004:y:2017:i:3:p:435-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.