IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jyf1hn/doi10.1431-107644y2023i2p311-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychology of Money and New Methods of Payment. Generational Differences Towards a Cashless Society

Author

Listed:
  • Cinzia Castiglioni
  • Giulia Sesini
  • Harriet Pinel
  • Edoardo Lozza

Abstract

The advent of the digital transformation and the progressive dematerialization of money is changing the way consumers relate to it. The increasing spread of new forms of electronic and virtual payment (e.g., credit cards, apps, and cryptocurrencies) is progressively replacing the use of cash, thus contributing to modifying how people think and feel about money. For these reasons, a comparison between younger generations (Gen Z, known for growing up in a digital and virtual world) and older ones, who grew up in a time when cash circulated to a greater extent, is particularly interesting. The purpose of this study is to carry out an initial exploration of the topic, investigating the different representations of money (cash vs. electronic) across generations, in terms of preferences, usage approaches, and the emotional experiences that go along with different payment methods. A qualitative research design was adopted, using semi-structured interviews to identify preferences, habits, approaches, attitudes, and opinions related to money and different methods of payment among different generations. Projective techniques were also employed through the provision of visual stimuli depicting different methods of payment (cash vs. electronic) in order to elicit representations and experiences related to different forms of money. The analysis of the interviews suggested some differences among generations in their approach to different payment methods. Generation Z tends to think about electronic money as a separate account than cash, the latter being often perceived as «already consumed» and disposable money. In contrast, older generations are more likely to perceive cash not as a separate account from the rest of their wealth, but rather as a store of value. Furthermore, people from senior generations express a strong affection for cash, a feeling which is not shared by younger individuals. Finally, individuals from Generation Z can be differentiated according to the life stage they are living. Students are still more attached to cash, which is felt as a means to exert self-control, while workers acknowledge an opposite sensation of lack of regulation while using cash. The present study takes a deep dive into a topic which has often been disregarded in past research. Given the advent of new forms of payment, our study provides additional understanding of how individuals differ in their attitudes toward electronic and cash money. Given the purely qualitative nature of the study, further investigation and confirmation of the results through quantitative research study designs is needed. Furthermore, the study was conducted in Italy, and future research might be conducted in other countries to examine the extent to which our findings apply cross-culturally. Understanding and identifying different generations’ approaches towards money and different methods of payment can have important practical implications for companies operating in a variety of industries (from retail to e-commerce) and for institutions in the credit and finance sector, enabling them to respond more adequately to changing purchasing and consumption habits.

Suggested Citation

  • Cinzia Castiglioni & Giulia Sesini & Harriet Pinel & Edoardo Lozza, 2023. "Psychology of Money and New Methods of Payment. Generational Differences Towards a Cashless Society," Micro & Macro Marketing, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 311-336.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/107644:y:2023:i:2:p:311-336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1431/107644
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1431/107644
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/107644:y:2023:i:2:p:311-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.