Author
Abstract
XVI century Japan ended a long period of transition: finally a new and stable institutional framework emerged under the Tokugawa "shogun". For a very long time the Imperial court, confined in Kyoto, had played an almost symbolic rule, while the power was in the hands of military governments (bakufu). However bakufu were increasingly unable to control local developments and in the provinces a new class of powerful landlords ("daimyo") was gaining autonomy in military, judicial, administrative and economic matters. The system of property rights and income distribution played a central role in shaping the new social and economic structure. For many centuries, this system kept in balance central and local powers. Its flexibility was the reason of both the growth of economic activities and the loss of importance of the central apparatus of fiscal government. Property rights and rents' entitlements were split and became tradable economic goods among an increasing number of intermediaries in rural economics. Land productivity was raised by technological innovation; the development of non-rural activities - such as trading, transport, handicraft, exploitation of natural resources - laid the way to capital accumulation and the creation of markets for goods and financial activities. Japan began to trade with Western countries. "Daimyo" were well aware of the importance of economics in the struggle to strengthen their local power and their contractual strength versus the central government. The under-taking of new economic initiatives was on the agenda of many forward-looking "daimyo": fiscal reforms, trade development, currency and exchange rate regulation, control of powerful trade and handicraft associations, financial management of fiefs. However, many initiatives proved to be unsustainable and inefficient: constrained by structural impediments, institutional confusion and military urgencies, "daimyo" had to pursue many targets, often incompatible. It was only after political unification that Tokugawa shogun succeeded in striking a new balance between local and central powers and to reach a real governance of economic activities.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jrkmxm:doi:10.1410/9875:y:1999:i:1:p:87-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.