IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqyfkm/doi10.1432-97632y2020i1-2p249-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How much is Community Action Worth to the Local Economy? The Debate between «Instincts and Institutions» in the Process of Formation and Consolidation of Urban Commons in Naples

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Patrizia Vittoria

Abstract

Regional economics and economic sociology are strongly claiming the need toconduct empirical research on Communities, considered as the most significantexpressions of collective and informal action in contemporary cities. They areconsidered important because they make up an essential portion of the practicesthat coordinate the actors of a complex regional industrial organizational ecology.On such bases, the adoption of a network approach and motivational analysis oflinks has been recommended for empirical analysis. The aim of this study is toprovide a contribution on this matter through an updated reading of the incentivequestion and a possible application of the same to an empirical case. Thecomparison between the theoretical elements and those derived from the observedreality, featured by the communities inspired to the principle of commongoods in Naples, will allow us to draw some conclusions. In particular, the advantages/disadvantages of the individual’s adherence to the communities and of thelatter to the local network established with public institutions will be highlighted.Finally, some hypotheses on the future evolution of the observed network will beformulated in terms of reciprocity in the definition of the critical tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Patrizia Vittoria, 2020. "How much is Community Action Worth to the Local Economy? The Debate between «Instincts and Institutions» in the Process of Formation and Consolidation of Urban Commons in Naples," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1-2, pages 249-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/97632:y:2020:i:1-2:p:249-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1432/97632
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1432/97632
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/97632:y:2020:i:1-2:p:249-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.