Author
Abstract
The inability to design a clear and organic model of industrial development, a centuries-old economic backwardness, the responsibility of a local political class - unprepared from a technical and administrative point of view and disinterested in the fate of the city - led Naples to a decadence without return in the decades following the Unity. While the city lost its role as a privileged centre, entering a wider market and without the protectionist barriers of the Bourbon age, the limitation of its commercial potential and its commercial traffic came to light. Although in the first two decades there was no immediate backlash on Neapolitan trade - at a time when large-scale international trade was reducing the barriers between countries, accompanied by the development and modernization of infrastructure - the increased ship traffic failed to bring about a proportional wealth increase for the city, while the port was increasingly taking on the appearance of an airport for migrants, remaining limited to regional borders for goods traffic. Above all the urban structure suffered this crisis, being now inadequate to the needs of traffic, infrastructure and services of a modern city. The post-unitary transformation strategy therefore lacked an organic project of interventions, limited to partial interventions, which were not able to trigger a process of transformation of the metropolitan area. This research sheds light on how the two main issues - the development of port infrastructures and the transformation of the area in the industrial sense, strictly interrelated and complementary - were sore points in a historical moment in which the first real globalization and the development of international trade in the modern sense was taking place, probably generating one of the greatest missed opportunities that would have condemned the fate of Naples and the surrounding areas.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/91442:y:2018:i:1-2:p:221-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.