IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax choices of fiscal federalism. Implications for the Mezzogiorno Regions


  • Pica F.
  • Villani S.


The term «federalism» has not a unambiguous meaning: this involves a specific definition within each context we want to apply it. In the Italian case, such a definition results from the specifications of the art. 119 of the Constitution, paragraph 1-5, contained in the enabling act 42/2009. Such provisions are implemented by a large series of delegated decrees. The main objective to be pursued is established in the paragraph of the art. 119: it is necessary to ensure to territorial bodies «revenue and expenditure financial autonomy». Such an autonomy is concretely valid for all the bodies if the implementing finance system guarantees the availability of resources to a level that «finances entirely public functions» attributed to these bodies (art. 2, par. 2, lett. e) of the enabling act). Furthermore it is necessary «an adequate fiscal flexibility» within the system, that ensure an acceptable budget autonomy to all the bodies, including those with the lowest fiscal potential (art. 2, par. 2, lett. bb) of the enabling act). This study will show how a system based on additional taxes on personal income tax (addizionali IRPEF) - as delegated decrees are prefiguring - that is not specifically corrected by mechanisms that reward this fiscal effort, violates the criterion of fiscal flexibility, as well as that of reform financial sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Pica F. & Villani S., 2010. "Tax choices of fiscal federalism. Implications for the Mezzogiorno Regions," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 839-862.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/34188:y:2010:i:4:p:839-862

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. McCleary, Rachel & Barro, Robert, 2003. "Religion and Economic Growth across Countries," Scholarly Articles 3708464, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    2. Head, Keith & Ries, John, 2001. "Overseas Investment and Firm Exports," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 108-122, February.
    3. Robert J. Barro & Xavier Sala-i-Martin, 2003. "Economic Growth, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262025531, July.
    4. Marcus Scheiblecker & et al., 2003. "Austria's Economy in 2002: Another Year of Slow Growth," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 76(4), pages 257-323, April.
    5. Anna Giunta & Domenico Scalera, 2007. "L'impresa subfornitrice: redditività, produttività e divari territoriali," ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2007(3), pages 123-146.
    6. Robert J. Barro & Rachel McCleary, 2003. "Religion and Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 9682, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Brainard, S Lael, 1997. "An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-off between Multinational Sales and Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(4), pages 520-544, September.
    8. Robert J. Barro, 2003. "Determinants of Economic Growth in a Panel of Countries," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 4(2), pages 231-274, November.
    9. Giannola A. & Petraglia C., 2007. "Demand and supply oriented policies and development. The "forgotten" dualism," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 13-42.
    10. Xavier Sala-i-Martín & Elsa V. Artadi, 2003. "Economic growth and investment in the Arab world," Economics Working Papers 683, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    federalism; financial autonomy; Mezzogiorno; E60; H10; H70.;

    JEL classification:

    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/34188:y:2010:i:4:p:839-862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.