IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqyfkm/doi10.1432-28134y2008i2p335-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 2015 - A case study of sectorial and regional policies

Author

Listed:
  • A. Gavosto
  • G. Pellegrini
  • C. Scaglioni

Abstract

The "Budget Law 2007" introduced the main policy issues on the industrial innovation, included in the "Proposal" called "Industria 2015". Broadly speaking, the proposal represents an attempt, ambiguous and unique in many aspects, to set up the public spending used to foster private investments in both research and innovation fields, focusing on a few and highly specific objectives, considered priorities for the economic development. Albeit we are aware that it is too early to evaluate the proposal in its whole and compare the main differences between the old incentives scheme and the new one, we conclude that "Industria 2015" is in the middle between a dirigistic approach and a bottom up approach which requires a well-built harmonization between the different degrees of government. In our view, this aspect does not always represent an advantage, because it implies different stakeholder sable to constrain public choices at different levels. As a consequence, a strong institutional design is required in order to fulfil the aims present in "Industria 2015".

Suggested Citation

  • A. Gavosto & G. Pellegrini & C. Scaglioni, 2008. "Industry 2015 - A case study of sectorial and regional policies," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 335-350.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/28134:y:2008:i:2:p:335-350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1432/28134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1432/28134
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/28134:y:2008:i:2:p:335-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.