IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqyfkm/doi10.1432-25386y2007i2p527-568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues relating to the implementantion of the legislative decree 56/2000

Author

Listed:
  • A. Fontana

Abstract

The legislative decree 56/2000 has been, until now, the only attempt of introducing fiscal federalism in our legal system. The aim of this paper is to give an account of issues relating to its implementation, thinking back to how financial flows had been calculated in the first two years of decree enforcement, in accordance with a reasonable interpretation of legislative text. We provide an evaluation of financial flows due to Regions in 2002, on the basis of data accessed by the High Study Commission for the Implementation of Fiscal Federalism in order to discharge its institutional duties. The analysis shows problems of misinterpretation, unclearness and incompleteness of the legislative text. The unavailability of proper data and the confusion about sources and their survey make more difficult the implementation which would require a coordinated policy among different Central and Regional Administrations involved. The results of the 2002 simulation show that almost all Southern Regions have had less resources than they would have been due if the decree 56/2000 had been carried out as suggested here. In any case, once running regularly, differences between the amount actually due to Regions and that assigned according to the legislative decrre 56/2000 continue to be substantial.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Fontana, 2007. "Issues relating to the implementantion of the legislative decree 56/2000," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 527-568.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/25386:y:2007:i:2:p:527-568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1432/25386
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1432/25386
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqyfkm:doi:10.1432/25386:y:2007:i:2:p:527-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.