IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqmthn/doi10.1435-82218y2015i3p363-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Banking union: the quasi-judicial review of supervisory and resolution decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Sciascia

Abstract

The EU banking union is currently based on two pillars which present high degree of interinstitutional and decisional complexity. In the context of both the SSM and the SRM, two quasi-judicial bodies have been established so as to ensure a qualified and rapid review of decisions taken by the European supervisory and resolution authorities; these bodies will intervene upon request by affected individuals and, in some instances, national authorities. The paper analyzes the model of such internal review bodies under a EU administrative law perspective; a comparison with certain other existing internal bodies established to review the decisions of other EU agencies is presented. It is argued that the banking union does not present a defined and convergent model of review, but rather two innovative and similar systems which mirror the features of the mechanisms they are reffered to and further diversify the landscape of administrative review in European law.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Sciascia, 2015. "Banking union: the quasi-judicial review of supervisory and resolution decisions," Banca Impresa Società, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 363-391.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/82218:y:2015:i:3:p:363-391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1435/82218
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1435/82218
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/82218:y:2015:i:3:p:363-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.