IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqmthn/doi10.1435-100097y2021i2p189-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative and Judicial Review on Decisions of the European Banking Regulatory and Supervisory Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Antoniazzi

Abstract

Regulatory and supervisory decisions of the EBA, the Single Resolution Committee and the ECB can be challenged by administrative appeal before the Joint Board of Appeal, the Appeals Panel and the Administrative Review Council, respectively. The discipline of pre-judicial review presents interesting profiles of investigation and comparison with regard to the composition, independence of the members, the powers exercisable and the content of the control with substantial differences for the review schemes. General considerations emerge regarding the relevance of disputes and the effectiveness of the protection of subjective positions. In any case, judicial protection before the European courts is always admitted for the control of legitimacy, as an action directly involving the decisions of the Authorities or the revision decisions of the competent bodies. The study highlights several problems in the interpretation and application of internal administrative control measures and examines the litigation in the courts and the relevant critical issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Antoniazzi, 2021. "Administrative and Judicial Review on Decisions of the European Banking Regulatory and Supervisory Authorities," Banca Impresa Società, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 189-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/100097:y:2021:i:2:p:189-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1435/100097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1435/100097
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/100097:y:2021:i:2:p:189-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.