IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jl9ury/doi10.1425-30839y2009i3p301-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social equality and economic efficiency: an international comparison based on net total social expenditure data

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Tomassi

Abstract

There is no conclusive empirical evidence about the relationships between social expenditure and economic outcomes, notwithstanding a theoretical framework characterized by the equality-efficiency trade-off. Some statistical problems arise from wide differences in the design of the social protection schemes and in the sources of financing. New Oecd data about net total social expenditure referred to 2005 help us to prevent such problems, sketching a new system of social accounting focused on the sum of public net social expenditure and private out-of-pocket spending. In the Oecd countries, a low public social expenditure implies an high private spending, so that the shares of national product devoted to social purposes are similar in Continental Europe and in Anglo-Saxon countries. However, such differences in the public-private mix of social spending have an impact on effective protection from social needs and on the distribution of social well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Tomassi, 2009. "Social equality and economic efficiency: an international comparison based on net total social expenditure data," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 301-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/30839:y:2009:i:3:p:301-326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/30839
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/30839
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/30839:y:2009:i:3:p:301-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.