IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jl9ury/doi10.1425-11140y2003i3p471-496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Devolution" britannica, devoluzione italiana: analogie nelle differenze

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Gianluca Bianchi

Abstract

The article proposes a comparison between British devolution and Italian one, both have occurred at about the same time (from the end of Nineties years until now), looking what is common in devolution process inside two cultural and institutional context deeply different. About the constitutional innovation, British and Italian political systems know different method to pass a reform: in British system, Westminster parliament is "sovereign" not only in ordinary law-making but above all in constitutional matter (this is the meaning of parliament sovereignty in Dicey's thought); in Italian system, constitutional power isn't on the same degree of ordinary law, because the parliament makes ordinary law and an "ad hoc convention" makes the constitution (or at least its fundamental reforms), as it's in French tradition. In spite of so, it's possible to see a common element in British and Italian devolution, on the side of its limits: that is the difficult to compatible the post-centralistic state and its fiscal autonomy with the universalistic principles of welfare state. This may be one of the mains challenge that Western states will have to face, looking for a new political balances for the new era that follows the cold war end.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Gianluca Bianchi, 2003. ""Devolution" britannica, devoluzione italiana: analogie nelle differenze," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 471-496.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/11140:y:2003:i:3:p:471-496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/11140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/11140
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/11140:y:2003:i:3:p:471-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.