IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-89461y2017i4p573-584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural heritage in Italy and its public: a portrait by the numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Cicerchia

Abstract

If museums can be described, statistically, as a population, what are the reasons for such approach? What kind of information is generated when cultural heritage institutions - which are usually treated with qualitative methods, as individual, unique units - are analysed as a (large) group? In Italy, since the late 1980s, researchers have indeed accosted the subject with an encompassing, quantitative and aggregate vision. This approach renders an ex-post global, quasi-systemic picture of a field that is endemically dispersed from the institutional and fragmented from the policy points of view. Seeing museums as a statistical population helps highlighting common trends in management and budget, staff, conservation issues, research and cultural activities, relationships with the public, and much more. And, indeed, that way of looking at cultural heritage units discloses significant features of their territory, at various scales. In the general framework of the European Year of Cultural Heritage, the article synthesises the main findings of the recent (2016) census of cultural heritage organisations in Italy, data about cultural participation and discusses the emerging challenge of audience engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Cicerchia, 2017. "Cultural heritage in Italy and its public: a portrait by the numbers," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 573-584.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/89461:y:2017:i:4:p:573-584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/89461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/89461
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/89461:y:2017:i:4:p:573-584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.