IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-81248y2015i2p285-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In search of economic balance in an opera house. The Teatro La Fenice case

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Brunetti

Abstract

Before analysing the strategic choices that the Fondazione Teatro La Fenice has implemented in recent years, the essay reflects on certain assumptions that affect the economics of opera. After noting that opera production meets «market failure», because this activity can't achieve economic self-sufficiency - which explains why public and private sectors should support it by providing appropriate funding - it analyses the specific economic balance of an opera house, the proceeds attainable (contributions and box office) and the cost (permanent staff, cast, fixed expenses). The essay then identifies the strategies to pursue, depending on the context in which the institution operates, and finally it discusses the strategy of productivity - the optimal use of available resources - which integrates the traditional «seasons» (eight new productions a year) with repertoire (the revival of productions presented in previous years). This pattern has been successfully implemented by the Fondazione Teatro La Fenice, thanks also to the tourist flow through the city of Venice, and can be a benchmark for many Italian opera houses which have recently required rescue packages from the state. Of course, this strategy can only be used as an adjunct to government and/or private grants, which are still of vital importance to opera theatres.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Brunetti, 2015. "In search of economic balance in an opera house. The Teatro La Fenice case," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 285-296.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/81248:y:2015:i:2:p:285-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/81248
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/81248
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/81248:y:2015:i:2:p:285-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.