IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-80346y2015i1p47-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'impatto sociale che vorremmo

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Dal Pozzolo

Abstract

In Italy the evaluation of cultural investments and activities is not yet a standard general procedure. Other difficulties relate to the timescale and dimensions of cultural activities. It is not unrealistic that an assessment procedure could be required before all effects of a cultural project are unveiled and become measurable; it is thus necessary to develop very sensitive tools to assess subtle changes in a project's initial and early phases. These difficulties drive the adoption of ad hoc methodologies and the building of specific indicators that are able to capture the actual dynamic of the single project, but bespoke solutions for assessment risk losing the capacity to make comparisons between different approaches and projects. For these reasons it is greatly desirable to create an archive of different project assessments at an international level (or even by starting at a national level by gathering together assessments of Creative Europe projects) to compare methodologies, results, and to inspire work towards a better fine-tuning of all measuring systems that are able to represent social and cultural impacts in realistic terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Dal Pozzolo, 2015. "L'impatto sociale che vorremmo," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 47-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/80346:y:2015:i:1:p:47-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/80346
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/80346
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/80346:y:2015:i:1:p:47-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.