IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-78864y2014i2p171-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evaluation of the ECoC: Evolutions and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Montalto
  • Maria Iglesias

Abstract

The European Capital of Culture (ECoC) event is increasingly understood as an ambitious investment enabling cities to reinvent themselves. In addition to its cultural dimension, it has proved to be a key catalyst to foster social cohesion, attain economic goals and/or radically improve the image of a city. Rather than as a one-off event, the ECoC title is then perceived as an integral part of the local development strategy to pursue a variety of specific goals. Impact assessment studies help measure whether the ECoC's ambitions are truly fulfilled. As such, an increasing number of ECoCs (Glasgow 1998, Luxembourg 2007, Liverpool 2008, Essen 2010, Mons 2015 etc.) has developed indicators and methodologies to assess the impacts of the event across different dimensions (culture, economy, image, policies, etc.). Furthermore, the European Commission has introduced new assessment obligations for ECoCs post-2019. However, measuring impacts remains a challenging exercise for a number of reasons (from the shortage of data, to the lack of accuracy in defining expected impacts to the methodological pitfalls for instance in relation to the calculation of multipliers). After an introduction to the most recent trends as regards ECoC evaluation, this paper will focus on the multidimensional scope of the ECoCs' impacts. It will then present the main challenges that still remain to be faced to ensure that impacts are accurately assessed and that evaluation ultimately contributes to the development of culture-led development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Montalto & Maria Iglesias, 2014. "The Evaluation of the ECoC: Evolutions and Challenges," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 171-182.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/78864:y:2014:i:2:p:171-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/78864
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/78864
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/78864:y:2014:i:2:p:171-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.