IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-77281y2014i1p113-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plaidoyer pour le FRAC. The FRAC are thirty years old and are still questioned

Author

Listed:
  • Claude Mollard

Abstract

The article objects to the many critics targeted at the FRAC (Regional Funds for Contemporary Arts) since their creation in 1984 by the French Ministry of Culture, and even more so in their 30th anniversary. To the critics concerning the quality of the works of art acquired, the author replies that, notwithstanding some mistakes, the FRAC have been purchasing, at affordable prices, works by some of the most famous French and international contemporary artists (Boltansky, Pistoletto, etc...) before they reached fame. He also underlines the diversity in the choices of works of art by the different regions. As for the reproach of the high costs of the FRAC, he replies that the average annual cost of 1 million euro for each FRAC - purchasing, safeguarding and exposing 1000-3000 works of art - is five to ten times cheaper than the cost of a municipal theatre. He finally objects to the critics of transparency, that all the informations about the 26.000 works of art purchased can be found on the website videomuseum. The real issue presently at stake, in his opinion, deals with the future perspectives of the FRAC. Some of the regions are actually transforming them, from light structures in support of creation, into museums of contemporary arts, thus substantially increasing their costs in time of financial constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Claude Mollard, 2014. "Plaidoyer pour le FRAC. The FRAC are thirty years old and are still questioned," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 113-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/77281:y:2014:i:1:p:113-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/77281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/77281
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/77281:y:2014:i:1:p:113-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.