IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-74580y2013i2p175-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When crowds produce and finance culture

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Cicerchia

Abstract

Crowdsourcing and crowdfunding are relatively old practices, butthey got a dramatic boost by the Internet. Today they both have adeep impact on cultural and creative production and are valued as innovativeways to sustain young and young people's enterprises in thatfield. In times of economic crisis, crowdfunding is seen by many observersand policymakers as the only possible complement, if not substitution,for public funding of culture.The basic models of crowdfunding are shortly described: donations,reward-based, microfinance, equity.Crowdfunding and crowdsourcing involve however a few critical aspects,not only for investors who are risking their money in highly unstableprojects, but also - and probably more important - for culturaland creative workers. Competition between professionals and amateursunder crowdsourcing schemes often results in a marginalization of theformer or in a massive exploitation of unpaid work. Crowdfunding, rightlyconsidered as a progress in transparency and a form of democratizationof patronage, is sometimes carried out with no clear statementof project evaluation and selection criteria.2012 Data about crowdfunding in the EU and in Italy are presented.The article also introduces the new Italian Regulation for crowdfunding(July 2013).

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Cicerchia, 2013. "When crowds produce and finance culture," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 175-188.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/74580:y:2013:i:2:p:175-188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/74580
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/74580
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/74580:y:2013:i:2:p:175-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.