IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Scelte e prassi nuove per la musica lirica e sinfonica in Italia

Listed author(s):
  • Leon Alessandro F.

The author summarizes the principal aspects analysed and the mainresults and suggestions offered by the seven authors contributing the TEMA, dividing their arguments in three main topics: the origin of the financial crisis, the judgment of the government intervention, and the proposals for the re-generation of the Italian Opera House sector. In the context of its general financial crisis, blaming the decline in the public financing, an institutional reform has to be proposed in tackling all the relevant problems: to redefine the general objectives of the opera organizations, to focus on the expansion of the opera consuming within the Italian citizens, to reassess the musical offer on the bases of the demand basins, to deepen the managerial approach in the Opera Houses firms, to propose a new corporate governance model, splitting the current Opera House Foundation in a few different firms, separating the orchestras, the chorus and the ballet divisions, from the Theatre: a choice to be made case by case.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Economia della Cultura.

Volume (Year): (2010)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 493-504

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/33837:y:2010:i:4:p:493-504
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/33837:y:2010:i:4:p:493-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.