IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance of culture in the UK


  • Rod Fisher
  • Cristopher Gordon


Britain's cultural policy and support since the end of World War 2 hasbeen a mixture of public, voluntary and private, often described as occupying a mid-way position between more «statist» European models and the laissez faire of the USA. Government financial subsidy has been exercised through intermediate, semi-independent bodies - such as the BBC, the Arts Councils and the Film Commission - intended to protect (not always successfully) institutions from political interference, or via local government provision. The radically reforming Thatcher governments of the 1980s dictated a need for improved efficiency, which led to greater economically-driven instrumental policy. Subsequently it was up to another conservative Prime Minister, to create, in 1992, the first comprehensive British Ministry for culture and the media, as well as the the National Lottery, which led to a remarkable increase in revenue for the arts and heritage. 13 years of Labour government from 1997 emphasised both the social value of culture and the creative industries, and encouraged synergies between different policy areas, while further increasing government funding of culture. Following the 2010 election, the newly formed Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government is predicting years of austerity to deal with the national debt, with funding cuts of at least 25% and a rapid abolition of parts of the intermediate structure dealing with film, museums and libraries.

Suggested Citation

  • Rod Fisher & Cristopher Gordon, 2010. "Governance of culture in the UK," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 211-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/32869:y:2010:i:2:p:211-230

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/32869:y:2010:i:2:p:211-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.