IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gli assi tematici di una prima analisi comparata


  • Carla Bodo


The scope of this article is to single out some of the common thematicissues in the models of the governance of culture in France, the United Kingdom, Germany and Poland, as analyzed in the other contributions to this number of the journal. Special attention has been focused on the following issues: institutional models of public intervention in the cultural field, with the dilemma Ministry of Culture/arm's length Agency; the diverging/converging relationships among the national and the local levels of government; the trends towards an increased public-private partnership; main strategies and priorities. Among the latter, a more or less strong commitment of the four countries on research and evaluation of the impact of their governance of culture has been underlined, along with a different emphasis put forward on the traditional priorities to be pursued by public policies in the field - heritage safeguard, support to artistic excellence and innovation and to wider participation and access - and on the new emerging priorities in a globalizing world: creative and artistic education, social inclusion and intercultural dialogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Bodo, 2010. "Gli assi tematici di una prima analisi comparata," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 183-192.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/32867:y:2010:i:2:p:183-192

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/32867:y:2010:i:2:p:183-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.