IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-31105y2009i3p325-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gli studi di impatto dei festival: esperienze e riflessioni

Author

Listed:
  • Ilaria Morganti
  • Massimiliano Nuccio

Abstract

The main objective of the present paper is to evaluate opportunities and limitations of impact studies in the cultural domain, according to two studies commissioned to the authors by two new performing arts festivals in Milan-Turin and in Naples. MITO SettembreMusica (MITO) took place in September 2007 and was promoted and produced by the Associazione per il Festival Internazionale della Musica di Milano and the Fondazione per le Attività Musicali di Torino. Napoli Teatro Festival Italia (NTFI) was instead organised in June 2008 by the Fondazione Campania dei Festival. The cases show that a mere economic impact study might be misleading in evaluating the complex interaction between festival, artistic field and urban context: a multi-dimensional approach seems to address more effectively objectives and values of such festivals. The monitoring of such events should not be only a marketing exercise but a strategic companion for cultural organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilaria Morganti & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2009. "Gli studi di impatto dei festival: esperienze e riflessioni," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 325-340.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/31105:y:2009:i:3:p:325-340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/31105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/31105
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/31105:y:2009:i:3:p:325-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.