IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-21453y2005i4p439-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Il fantasma della cultura

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Cicerchia

Abstract

While in the 2000-2006 programming period culture received about 80% of the total UE funding through the Structural Funds, the next oneappears to be oriented to get rid altogether of culture. After a summary review of fifteen years of progressive inclusion of culture in the Structural Funds, the article considers the proposals of regulations for 2007-2013 and the Community Strategic Guidelines in search of indirect spaces where cultural policies could take new roots. In particular, guidelines concerning the attractiveness of Europe and its regions, the increase and improvement of knowledge and innovation and of jobs are taken into consideration, as well as the territorial dimension of cohesion policy, including cities, the rural areas and cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Cicerchia, 2005. "Il fantasma della cultura," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 439-454.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/21453:y:2005:i:4:p:439-454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/21453
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/21453
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/21453:y:2005:i:4:p:439-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.