IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-116315y2024i2-3p495-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers and barriers of institutional cultural crowdfunding uptake. A methodological proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Rykkja
  • Lluís Bonet

Abstract

This article presents a methodology and preliminary results of a study examining the factors influencing the adoption or rejection of cultural crowdfunding by arts and cultural institutions. Using a Norwegian museum consortium as a case study, the article employs a mixed methods approach to uncover these factors. The aim is to use the methodology for empirical research that lay the groundwork for advancing theoretical and managerial knowledge in this emerging field.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Rykkja & Lluís Bonet, 2024. "Drivers and barriers of institutional cultural crowdfunding uptake. A methodological proposition," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2-3, pages 495-498.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/116315:y:2024:i:2-3:p:495-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/116315
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/116315
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/116315:y:2024:i:2-3:p:495-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.