IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-103318y2021i3p469-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Europe: Artistic Freedom, Democracy and Tolerance

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Bettencourt da Camara
  • Natalie Giorgadze
  • Tere Badia

Abstract

Culture has a powerful potential to advance European values, which are central to our democratic societies. Together with Media and Academic Freedom, Artistic Freedom provides an essential counterweight to injustice and oppression, as well as raise awareness, challenge perceptions and stimulate public debates, in the EU as well as in candidate and potential candidate countries. Digital transformation, accelerated with the Covid 19 pandemic, is changing the way we participate in cultural life. Stripped down to cultural products and devoid of larger social and communal experiences, access to digitised culture is a click away. However, algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) ruling the Internet are neither fair nor neutral. On the contrary, they often reproduce and even amplify existing biases as algorithm learning depends on data. Algorithms that reflect certain biases (racial, gender or ideological) are shaping cultural production and consumption. Regarding the digital cultural production and dissemination, we need specific cultural policies that tackle the critical environmental toll of our current data ecosystem and imagine future sustainable technologies. A holistic strategy, as proposed by the Cultural Deal for Europe framework is needed, as this cultural dimension cannot be forgotten whenever we tackle the societal, environmental, and economic challenges that need transversal and multidisciplinary responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Bettencourt da Camara & Natalie Giorgadze & Tere Badia, 2021. "The Paradox of Europe: Artistic Freedom, Democracy and Tolerance," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 469-475.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/103318:y:2021:i:3:p:469-475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/103318
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/103318
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/103318:y:2021:i:3:p:469-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.