IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-100728y2020i3-4p323-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cultural heritage sector and economic statistics. Profiling contemporary cultural heritage practice in the nace codes

Author

Listed:
  • Conor Newman
  • Elis Marcal
  • Susan Corr
  • Erminia Sciacchitano

Abstract

Critiquing the classification of the cultural heritage sector in the NACE Codes, the paper argues that in failing to capture the contribution of key actors the existing classification does not offer an accurate measure of the magnitude or diversity of economic activity in the sector, and the contribution it makes to the European economy. Moreover, the classificatory hierarchy employed in the NACE Codes is not utilised fully with respect to the sector, leading to the exclusion of relevant specialisms, such as Conservation-Restoration, from the data. It is argued that the NACE Codes reflect a somewhat anachronistic model of a sector dominated by public institutions when in fact the majority of today’s practitioners work in the private sector. The paper proposes an alternative classification of cultural heritage, arguing that the relevant Division in the NACE Codes should be renamed «Cultural Heritage Activities». The paper finishes by considering how cultural heritage might be developed as a discrete sector, where the activity of Conservation-Restoration is situated alongside all other heritage related activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Conor Newman & Elis Marcal & Susan Corr & Erminia Sciacchitano, 2020. "The cultural heritage sector and economic statistics. Profiling contemporary cultural heritage practice in the nace codes," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3-4, pages 323-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/100728:y:2020:i:3-4:p:323-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/100728
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/100728
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/100728:y:2020:i:3-4:p:323-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.