IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-100723y2020i3-4p269-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cultural sector’s governance proved by COVID-19. A European comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Celestino Spada
  • Pietro A. Valentino

Abstract

In most countries, the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic has curbed or blocked activities related to cultural life, arts and performing arts, heritage as well as the supply and demand of the cultural and creative sector (CCS). Using information collected from March 2020 to March 2021 - and available on the websites of national and local institutions, national and international observatories or statistical institutes, public and private cultural institutions, trade unions, professional and social organizations – the article compares the different governance systems (formal and informal participated by public and private, profit and non-profit organizations) that map the sector in the main European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom) and in the United States highlighting the role they played in understanding the needs of the different players (firms, creatives, artists and professionals) in the sector and in making the support measures more immediate and effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Celestino Spada & Pietro A. Valentino, 2020. "The cultural sector’s governance proved by COVID-19. A European comparison," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3-4, pages 269-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/100723:y:2020:i:3-4:p:269-283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/100723
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/100723
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/100723:y:2020:i:3-4:p:269-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.