IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-75706y2013i3p541-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Google and the market of search engines

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Visco Comandini

Abstract

Search engine's multisided business model exploits indirect network externalities arisingbetween users, advertisers, and web sites shown in organic results. The platform'salgorithm simultaneously generates both organic results and relevant ads, highly appreciatedby consumers as measured by their click-through-rate. The paper analysesthe nature of this peculiar market, based on multiple and asymmetric transactionscoordinated by the platform, able to turn the traditional negative externality, imposedby ads to consumers in traditional media, into a weak but positive one. It discusses therecent Google's European Antitrust case, where the popular search engine is chargedfor abusing its dominant position by deliberately downgrading vertical (specialized)engine's websites at the benefit of its own competing services, and keep publisher'svaluable contents without their permission for its Google News service. Google hasrecently submitted specific commitments to close the case, in particular to show rivalsearch engine links in a specific result's page, and to allow opting-out choices forpublishers of their contents in Google News. By submitting commitments, Googlefirmly holds the principle of continuous innovation of its search engine result's rankingcriteria, to not regulate as requested by search neutrality advocates.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Visco Comandini, 2013. "Google and the market of search engines," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 541-570.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/75706:y:2013:i:3:p:541-570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/75706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/75706
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/75706:y:2013:i:3:p:541-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.