IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-73450y2013i1p45-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Search algorithms and the boundaries of antitrust law and economics

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Urso

Abstract

The paper examines the conducts that are the object of the investigations for abuseof dominance brought against Google by the European Commission and the FederalTrade Commission, with particular emphasis on the manipulation of natural searchalgorithms. Brought the relevant market within the category of two-sided platforms,the paper focuses on the nature of the product or service provided by the search enginethrough the delivery of results, that is to be qualified as an information. For thisreason, the incidence of the alteration of the algorithms on consumer choice as wellas the subsequent prejudice to competitors directly arise from the information giventhrough the search results, rather than from a commercial behavior of the company.As a result such manipolative conduct, since it is not based on any commercial behaviorcapable of direct disturbance of market dynamics, does not involve any antitrustissues. As a consequence, other remedies are needed for the conduct under evaluation,the informative nature of which leads to make reference to unfair competitionand detractive behaviors regulation to protect competitors, as well as to misleadingcommercial practices provisions in consumer protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Urso, 2013. "Search algorithms and the boundaries of antitrust law and economics," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 45-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/73450:y:2013:i:1:p:45-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/73450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/73450
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/73450:y:2013:i:1:p:45-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.