IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Arenaways and other (non-edifying) railways stories

Listed author(s):
  • Boitani Andrea
  • Ramella Francesco

Arenaways was the first private Italian company to enter the Italian rail passenger market on the route between Turin and Milan. Access to the network was delayed by the network operator (RFI), controlled by the same holding (FS) that controls the incumbent rail service company, Trenitalia. RFI also reported to the Office of Rail Regulation (URSF) of the Ministry of Transport on the ground that Arenaways'service might disrupt the profitability of Trenitalia's service contract compensating public service obligations. The URSF agreed with RFI and Arenaways was forced to change its business plan three days before starting operations, on November 10, 2010. Arenaways immediately brought its case to the attention of the Antitrust authority. The results of the inquiry are still to be disclosed (after 14 months). In the meanwhile Arenaways went bankrupt. This and other stories call into question the regulatory framework of Italian railways.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Mercato Concorrenza Regole.

Volume (Year): (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 97-116

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/36774:y:2012:i:1:p:97-116
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/36774:y:2012:i:1:p:97-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.