IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-26057y2007i3p575-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kill Bill Vol. 2

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Pardolesi
  • Andrea Renda

Abstract

Con ogni probabilità, l'unico dato positivo della decisione resa dal Tribunale di Primo Grado nel caso Microsoft europeo è il fatto stesso che una vicenda durata nove anni sia finalmente giunta al termine. Peraltro, la soluzione divisata dal Tribunale appare ancor più problematica della (già acrobatica) decisione della Commissione, che risale al 2004. Gli autori analizzano il contenuto della sentenza del Tribunale, con particolare riferimento all'applicazione del test di Magill/IMS, l'interpretazione del concetto di interoperabilità, il c.d. "new product screen" e la complessa interazione tra "esercizio normale" dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale e scrutinio antitrust. Ne emerge un quadro a tinte fosche, soprattutto per quanti auspicavano che l'antitrust comunitario evolvesse verso un "more economic approach".

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Pardolesi & Andrea Renda, 2007. "Kill Bill Vol. 2," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 575-586.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/26057:y:2007:i:3:p:575-586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/26057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/26057
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/26057:y:2007:i:3:p:575-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.