IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Kill Bill Vol. 2

Listed author(s):
  • Pardolesi Roberto
  • Renda Andrea
Registered author(s):

    Con ogni probabilità, l'unico dato positivo della decisione resa dal Tribunale di Primo Grado nel caso Microsoft europeo è il fatto stesso che una vicenda durata nove anni sia finalmente giunta al termine. Peraltro, la soluzione divisata dal Tribunale appare ancor più problematica della (già acrobatica) decisione della Commissione, che risale al 2004. Gli autori analizzano il contenuto della sentenza del Tribunale, con particolare riferimento all'applicazione del test di Magill/IMS, l'interpretazione del concetto di interoperabilità, il c.d. "new product screen" e la complessa interazione tra "esercizio normale" dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale e scrutinio antitrust. Ne emerge un quadro a tinte fosche, soprattutto per quanti auspicavano che l'antitrust comunitario evolvesse verso un "more economic approach".

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Mercato Concorrenza Regole.

    Volume (Year): (2007)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 575-586

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/26057:y:2007:i:3:p:575-586
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/26057:y:2007:i:3:p:575-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.