IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La direttiva Bolkestein

Listed author(s):
  • Heimler Alberto
Registered author(s):

    On February 16, 2006 the European Parliament adopted at first-reading a draft of the proposed Directive on services in the internal market (the so called Bolkestein Directive, from the name of the Commissioner for the Internal Market who proposed its adoption in 2004). In its original formulation, in order to promote the free movement of services the draft Directive was strongly based on the "country of origin" principle and, only marginally, on the need to harmonize very divergent national systems of regulation. The political debate concentrated on the widespread application of the "country of origin" principle which, in the absence of a substantial convergence of national legislation, might well lead to very negative unwanted results. Opponents of the Directive attacked on these grounds the "country of origin" principle and, as a consequence, were able to introduce a very wide range of exclusions. A greater attention to the need to harmonise national legislations (also by making its mandatory for member States to thoroughly apply Regulatory Impact Analysis) would have weakened the arguments of the opponents to the Directive and would have speeded up its approval, preventing the proliferation of exclusions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Mercato Concorrenza Regole.

    Volume (Year): (2006)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 95-110

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/21866:y:2006:i:1:p:95-110
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/21866:y:2006:i:1:p:95-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.