IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-116744y2024i3p459-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risks and Benefits of Data Portability: The Case of Black Boxes in the Italian Motor Insurance Market

Author

Listed:
  • Donatella Porrini
  • Marta Infantino
  • Paola Monaco

Abstract

Over the last decade, Italy has enacted many legal reforms to promote the installation of black boxes in motor vehicles for insurance purposes. The rationale behind this reform is the idea that black boxes allow for a more precise personalization of insurance products and reduce the risk of fraud. The last of these reforms focuses on data portability and gives policyholders the right to obtain some of the information collected by the black box in the previous year and to share it with another insurance company. The reform allows virtuous customers to transfer their reputation from one insurance company to another in order to reduce switching costs and to combat lock-in effects, thereby improving competition in the insurance sector. While data portability may indeed have beneficial consequences at the contractual level, its overall impact on the insurance market is much harder to predict. The aim of this paper is therefore to test the impact of black box data portability on the motor insurance market and to assess the risks and benefits of the reform from both the legal and the economic perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Donatella Porrini & Marta Infantino & Paola Monaco, 2024. "Risks and Benefits of Data Portability: The Case of Black Boxes in the Italian Motor Insurance Market," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 459-477.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/116744:y:2024:i:3:p:459-477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/116744
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/116744
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/116744:y:2024:i:3:p:459-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.