IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-110y2000i3p635-650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrattazione collettiva e antitrust: un problema aperto

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro Ichino

Abstract

The essay takes the European Court of Justice recent decision on the Albany case as a starting point for discussing the issue of the possible conflict between the principle of collective bargaining of working conditions and the freedom of competition safeguard in Community and Italian law. The Author suggests that the principle of collective bargaining widely asserted itself, both in national and in I.L.O.'s international systems, as leading instrument for correcting the typical distortions of the original labour market, due to structural monopsony situations. EU labour policy - principally aimed at correcting workers' information, training and mobility faults - seems, on the contrary, the answer to problems raised by dynamic monopsony situations, which are typical of developed labour markets. It is therefore possible to account for the lack, in EU law, of a collective bargaining safeguard principle bearing constitutional rank, as well as the need to balance coalition and collective bargaining freedom with the principle of free competition. Some possible balancing criteria are suggested in the last paragraph, where the author particularly emphasizes the fact that within this subject juridical considerations should also take into account the economic perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Ichino, 2000. "Contrattazione collettiva e antitrust: un problema aperto," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 635-650.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/110:y:2000:i:3:p:635-650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/110
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/110:y:2000:i:3:p:635-650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.