IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-104869y2022i1p163-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

«Downstream» Omnibus Guarantees Based on an Anticompetitive «Upstream» Agreement: Old and New Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Magliulo

Abstract

Muovendo dall’esame della sentenza n. 41994/2021 delle sezioni unite della Corte di Cassazione, sul tema della validità dei contratti di fideiussione omnibus stipulati in conformità al c.d. «Modello Abi» (i.e. lo schema contrattuale standard redatto dall’Associazione Bancaria Italiana e ritenuto parzialmente anticoncorrenziale dalla Banca d’Italia – responsabile dell’enforcement antitrust in ambito creditizio – nel maggio 2005), l’Autore esamina le problematiche relative all’onere della prova gravante sul fideiussore che rivendica la nullità del contratto di garanzia «a valle». Alla luce della recente giurisprudenza, il contributo si propone di individuare il thema probandum in tali giudizi di nullità, soffermandosi sul valore probatorio della decisione della Banca d’Italia n. 55 del 2 maggio 2005 e sull’opportunità di adottare meccanismi presuntivi, volti ad alleviare l’onere della prova a carico del garante. Infine, l’Autore analizza criticamente le argomentazioni della decisione delle sezioni unite, fondate su una interpretazione poco convincente dell’art. 1419 c.c.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Magliulo, 2022. "«Downstream» Omnibus Guarantees Based on an Anticompetitive «Upstream» Agreement: Old and New Issues," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 163-176.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/104869:y:2022:i:1:p:163-176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/104869
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/104869
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/104869:y:2022:i:1:p:163-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.