IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Only Institutions Grow Wiser. Profiles for the EU Fiscal Architecture


  • Luisa Giuriato


The European Union fiscal architecture combines hard and soft modes of policy coordination that constitute a complex set of fiscal rules and procedures. Since the crisis, the framework has been heavily unbalanced towards the hard mode creating an increasingly rigid and unwieldy system. Its flaws are rooted in the contradictions of the underlying intergovernmental decision-making regime that was strengthened during the crisis - the «new Union method» - and delivers unsatisfactory compromise decisions that hide important divergences among member states. The collective action problems that follow are dealt with by continuous adjustments and interpretations of the fiscal framework that, however, cannot remedy two main problems of intergovernmentalism: i) the inability to forge an aggregate fiscal policy stance and; ii) the weak legitimacy. If institutions are to grow wiser, they should take stock of the fact that even a more extended or refined architecture cannot remedy to these contradictions that risk jeopardizing the entire construction. Therefore, the current preference for procedural adaptation should be replaced by new original answers that punctually address analytically identified flaws while searching for a common fiscal stance, increased accountability for policy-making and responsiveness to participatory demands for democratic legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Giuriato, 2016. "Only Institutions Grow Wiser. Profiles for the EU Fiscal Architecture," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 387-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/85004:y:2016:i:3:p:387-412

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/85004:y:2016:i:3:p:387-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.