IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/je8794/doi10.1429-80931y2015i2p155-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Macro-Micro Classical Political-Economy Approach to Well-Being Gender Budgets

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Picchio

Abstract

In this paper we put public budgets in the context of current neoliberal austeritypolicy, clarifying along the way a widespread confusion between budgets as accountingtools and budgets as policy. In so doing we use first the surplus approach (Smith, Ricardo,Marx and Sraffa), as an open, policy-oriented framework that can acknowledge social complexityand deal with the current tensions inherent in the functional distribution between financialcapital and living conditions. This approach places the normal conventional costs ofsocial reproduction of labour at the centre of the determination of wages, residual profits andof the analysis of capital as «necessary consumption». This allows us to take social expenditureout of its present analytical marginality. We then expand the analysis of wages, usingAmartya Sen's well-being concept of standards of living as a multidimensional composite of«capabilities and functionings», i.e. as potential and effective individual «doings and beings».Finally, we go back to budgets to introduce the idea of Well-Being Gender Budgets as experimentalaccounting tools, able to reflect the complex relation between means - public resources- and ends - the well being of real women and men embedded in social contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Picchio, 2015. "A Macro-Micro Classical Political-Economy Approach to Well-Being Gender Budgets," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 155-174.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/80931:y:2015:i:2:p:155-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/80931
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/80931
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/80931:y:2015:i:2:p:155-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.