IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/je8794/doi10.1429-30794y2009i3p369-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small area methods in the estimation of poverty indicators: the case of Tuscany

Author

Listed:
  • Caterina Giusti
  • Monica Pratesi
  • Nicola Salvati

Abstract

In order to implement policies against poverty and inequality, policy makers all over Europe should have at their disposal information referring to appropriate domains, since the impossibility to access to goods and services varies with age, gender and zone of residence. However, the major Italian and European surveys collecting information on poverty and living conditions can be used to produce accurate indicators only at the regional level. To compute these indicators at the Provincial and Municipality levels there is the need to resort to small area methodologies. The aim of this paper is to produce and compare monetary indicators of poverty for the Provinces of Tuscany using parametric and nonparametric small area estimation methods. The target is the estimation of the "at-risk-of-poverty rate" (Head Count Ratio) and of the mean and the quantiles of the household income distribution using census data and data from the EUSILC survey. These measures can be considered as a starting point for more in depth analyses, such as the estimation of the income cumulative distribution function.

Suggested Citation

  • Caterina Giusti & Monica Pratesi & Nicola Salvati, 2009. "Small area methods in the estimation of poverty indicators: the case of Tuscany," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 369-380.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/30794:y:2009:i:3:p:369-380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/30794
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/30794
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/30794:y:2009:i:3:p:369-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.