IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Financial Crisis: New or Old Boundaries between Market and Welfare State?

Listed author(s):
  • Cavazzuti Filippo
Registered author(s):

    Crisis is hitting most severely the financial markets of common-law countries (like US and UK) than the markets of civil-law countries (like Italy and other countries in continental Europe). We argue that one reason of the deepening turmoil in the civil law countries is the supremacy in these countries of private welfare institutions (pension funds, mutual funds, insurances) based on the functioning of capital markets instead of - like in many civil law countries - the supremacy of the social welfare state financed by the public budget. In order to protect better in the future the human capital of families against several and lasting risks and uncertainties arising from the turmoil, not manageable by capital markets, we suggest the adoption, preservation and the improvement of the pay as you go system.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica.

    Volume (Year): (2009)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 5-30

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/29331:y:2009:i:1:p:5-30
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/29331:y:2009:i:1:p:5-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.