IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative methods for adjusting realization based capital gains taxes


  • Arachi Giampaolo


Capital gains taxation on a realization basis is known to give rise to a number of distortions and to several arbitrage opportunities that can result in a significant erosion in the tax base. Most countries tackle these problems through a series of "ad hoc" adjustments to "pure" realization based taxation, such as separate treatment of ordinary income and capital gains, reduced tax rates on long-term capital gains, limited loss offsets. The theoretical literature proposes several methods which may provide a more comprehensive solution along the lines suggested by Vickrey (1939) and Meade (1978). However no country, except Italy, have experimented any of these methods. This paper reviews the alternatives in order to evaluate them primarily on the basis of compliance and administrative costs and political feasibility. The analysis highlights that most of the difficulties in the implementation of any of the comprehensive solutions are related to the taxation of intermediate payments such as dividends. This issue has been relatively neglected by the existing literature. We show that no proposal may overcome all the objections raised in the literature and in the debate on the Italian experiment. Each method should be judged as a second best solution and evaluated with reference to a specific institutional and economic environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Arachi Giampaolo, 2007. "Alternative methods for adjusting realization based capital gains taxes," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 141-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/24805:y:2007:i:2:p:141-170

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Abowd, John M. & Kramarz, Francis, 1999. "The analysis of labor markets using matched employer-employee data," Handbook of Labor Economics,in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 40, pages 2629-2710 Elsevier.
    2. Agar Brugiavini, 1998. "An Empirical Analysis of Interfirm Mobility in Italy," Giornale degli Economisti, GDE (Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia), Bocconi University, vol. 57(1), pages 1-34, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/24805:y:2007:i:2:p:141-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.