IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/je8794/doi10.1429-100367y2020i3p277-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acting for gender equality: Evidence, gaps and prospects for real change in economic policy

Author

Listed:
  • Tindara Addabbo
  • Gulay Gunluk-Senesen
  • Angela O'Hagan

Abstract

Gender inequality in the access to the labour market and income distribution has increased as a consequence of the economic impacts of the global pandemic due to the higher presence of women employed in the economic sectors most vulnerable to lockdown and shutdown and with the least opportunity to continue to work remotely or from home. The risk of receiving lower income protection is higher for women due to their more discontinuous working profile and their higher presence in precarious jobs. Gender distribution of unpaid care and domestic work load is persistently unequal. Blindness on the gender impact of public policies designed in the emergence of first wave of the pandemic had the effect of deepening pre-existing gender inequalities showing that integration of gender analysis dissipates as the policy process develops leading to the evaporation of gender equality in economic policy making. Actions acknowledging the roots of gender inequalities together with the implementation of gender mainstreaming at all levels of economic policies are needed to revert this trend and to lead to a more gender equal society.

Suggested Citation

  • Tindara Addabbo & Gulay Gunluk-Senesen & Angela O'Hagan, 2020. "Acting for gender equality: Evidence, gaps and prospects for real change in economic policy," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 277-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/100367:y:2020:i:3:p:277-294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/100367
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/100367
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/100367:y:2020:i:3:p:277-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.