IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Il marxismo e l'impresa gestita dai lavoratori

Listed author(s):
  • Jossa Bruno

Unlike Proudhon, Marx was long assumed to have opposed the cooperative movement. In this paper, the Author provides evidence that Marx declared himself decidedly in favour of labour-managed firms at various stages in his scientific activity. In Marx's opinion, cooperative firms were proof that mass production in line with the behest of modern science was possible even in the absence of a class of masters employing a class of hired workers. Marx looked upon cooperative firms as a new production mode arising spontaneously within the capitalistic production mode and capable of outperforming it. The passages of Marx's work in which these reflections are set out were completely forgotten because of the erroneous assumption that Marx was a straightforward enemy of the market and advocated its elimination forthwith after the enactment of a revolution. In point of fact, both Marx and Engels repeatedly emphasised that market economies would only be abolished at the end of a long process expected to give birth to a "new man".

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Economia politica.

Volume (Year): (2002)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 445-470

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/8081:y:2002:i:3:p:445-470
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/8081:y:2002:i:3:p:445-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.