IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Moral Standing of the Market: A Capability-Based General Equilibrium Analysis

  • D'Agata Antonio

According to Sen (see, e.g. Sen, 1989), the moral standing of the market has to be related to market outcomes and inequality rather than to the exercise of people's "prior" rights and efficiency. Although developed within a consequentialist framework, general equilibrium theory has usually neglected the problem of inequality in favour of efficiency. Lately, however, considerable effort has been spent by neoclassical economists to prove that the market mechanism satisfies specific fairness requirements. In contrast with this literature, which follows the "welfarist" method of evaluation of states of affairs, Sen proposes to replace the concept of utility with the concept of capability in assessing inequality. The main aim of this paper is to provide sufficient conditions ensuring the existence of an initial allocation with an associated Walrasian equilibrium ensuring the equality of the "size" of the capability set for every agent in the economy, and to analyse the efficiency properties of such allocations.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Economia politica.

Volume (Year): (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 349-368

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/25817:y:2007:i:3:p:349-368
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/25817:y:2007:i:3:p:349-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.