IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jb33yl/doi10.1428-1971y2000i1p93-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La riflessione di Enzo Paci sull'economia politica: una disamina economico-filosofica

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Moscati

Abstract

This paper provides a theoretical examination of the inquiry of the Italian philosopher Enzo Paci (1911-1976) into the foundations of political economy. The article opens with an illustration of the issue of scientific knowledge in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology to which Paci refers. After clarifying the specific sense in which Paci conceives the task of science's foundation, this discussion illustrates his thesis, which links political economy to the experience of need. Two interpretations of Paci's thesis, both plausible, are then critically discussed. Paci's interpretation of Marx's critique of political economy is subsequently examined and his reading of Keynes's "General Theory" is discussed. Although Paci's inquiry is interesting because it delivers the epistemological reflection about economics from a purely methodological and formalistic perspective, it fails in its purpose. In conclusion the reasons for this failure are analysed; how an inquiry into the foundations of political economy ought to be stated in order to have a philosophical and epistemological relevance and in order to be significant in elaborating economic theory is pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Moscati, 2000. "La riflessione di Enzo Paci sull'economia politica: una disamina economico-filosofica," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 93-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/1971:y:2000:i:1:p:93-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1428/1971
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1428/1971
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/1971:y:2000:i:1:p:93-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.