Plusvalore e sfruttamento: una risposta
This short paper is a reply to a note published by Prof. Andrea Salanti in the present issue of this journal. The discussion concerns some theoretical questions related to the analysis of surplus value. The author thinks that a correct use of algebra, or of any other formalized language, cannot prove, or disprove, the truthfulness of a cognitive statement. But he does not share Salanti's feeling of an inherent inadequacy of all formal schemes to deal in a proper way with the problems posed by the existence of causal links in the real world. Another question discussed in the paper is the alleged lack of significance of the concept of surplus value in a post-Sraffian theoretical system.
Volume (Year): (1997)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/1846:y:1997:i:2:p:243-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.