IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

AGCM' Sector Studies in Services: a Critical Review

Listed author(s):
  • Marra Alessandro
Registered author(s):

    Once particular markets do not work well, resulting in serious negative effects for consumers, businesses and the entire economy, the Italian Antitrust Authority (IAA) might opt to carry out sector studies, the so-called «indagini conoscitive». By means of these IAA offers to private firms and public authorities a first important warning about which business conducts are lawful or which normative regulations are admissible under a competition law point of view, and gets a better knowledge of the industry at stake on the basis of which it might decide to launch further initiatives of public enforcement or competition advocacy. Given the wide-ranging set of reasons might underlie the IAA's sector studies and the variety of outcomes might take place from these, in this article we intend to provide a critical review of the «indagini conoscitive» initiated by the IAA between 1990 and 2010, with a strong emphasis on the services sector.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Economia dei Servizi.

    Volume (Year): (2010)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 497-514

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/33885:y:2010:i:3:p:497-514
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/33885:y:2010:i:3:p:497-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.