IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Indicators and Techniques for the Assessment of Market Power in the Electricity Sector

  • Abrate Graziano
  • Bompard Ettore
  • Ragazzi Elena

The many intrinsic (economic, physical and engineering) characteristics substantially differentiate the electrical sector from both other commodities and other public utility services. Within this context, the strategic «gaming» of the operators can generate results that are far from competitive efficiency standards. The main purpose of this article is to illustrate the ways simulation techniques can be used to assess the performance of an electrical system. In particular, the paper explores three specific aspects that might increase market inefficiency and need to be carefully considered when setting the regulations. The first aspect regards the natural monopoly asset of the sector, the second the management of the economic externalities created by the physical constraints of the transmission network, within a context that requires real-time matching of supply and demand. Finally the third aspect concerns the efficient management of peaks in demand within a context of non-storability of the product and limited price elasticity of demand.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.2382/33619
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2382/33619
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Economia dei Servizi.

Volume (Year): (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 321-340

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/33619:y:2010:i:2:p:321-340
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j1t56u:doi:10.2382/33619:y:2010:i:2:p:321-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.